Saturday, April 19, 2008

I really don't mind dumb T-shirts. But preachy dumb T-shirts? On the bike path last night I came upon a nimwit poking around the community garden with a T-shirt that read "One Less Car." What does that mean? Should I wear a T-shirt that reads "One Less Crucified Somerville Schmuck"? And why isn't it "One Fewer Car" or "One Fewer Somerville Schmuck"? I guess because you don't know the total number of cars or schmucks (although the ration seems to be 0:1, in my neck of the woods.) But back to the point - if this guy never owned a car, is it "one less car?" If he had a car and got rid of it, is he really justified in wearing a t-shirt that says "one less car?" Does he know that that his action has resulted in one less car? What if I had just gone out and bought another car? Or two other cars? Then I would have three and he would have none, and he would have to wear "One Car Fewer Than Would Be Otherwise Had Someone Not Gone Out And Purchased Two."

Or maybe not. My math is shaky, as will be remembered by the people I was having dinner with on NYE 2007 when I was rather swayingly holding forth on the relationship between punctuation and mathematical functions, and was like "IS four plus three eight, or does four plus three BECOME eight?" I suspect I've mentioned this before, but it's such an Oldie/Goodie. But I have to say that had my architect housemate not pointed it out, I do believe it would have gone un-commented upon, even if it's because no one pays attention to me.

I guess the problem is that "One Less Car" is a sentence fragment masquerading as a real thought. This is funny, as in my new job I find myself working with writers who are very suspicious of sentence fragments. I love them in theory, because when used well they show how few words need to be used to communicate, and I think that they're often compelling by structural definition. And people don't always realize the semantic power of grammar and punctuation. At work, however, the DO love the trailing-off ellipses, which often strikes me as three bullets to the heart...

One thing I can say if anyone ever considers an MAPW from Carnegie Mellon? It really does teach you how to argue for your choices, which is important in a world where, more or less, everyone thinks they can write. And they can, of course, but my sense is that with us, every single thing is considered and optimized. Back me up, Miss Marple! Daisy! (also, MAPW's? Whoa.)

In other news. a canary zoomed past our deck last night and landed on our fence, where it sat for hours. P. supposed it was hurt or freaked out by not being in a cage. Our next door neighbor tried to capture it because there was a cat lurking nearby. But now it's in our grape arbor thing, so http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/laf/648256545.html. But if all is lost, it would be sort of neat to get a photograph of the cat that ate the canary, for future comparison.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think this is a form of accounting pioneered in Bleak House, where if you think about spending money you've saved it and get to spend it on something else. So, though I have a car (but only one for a two-person household! and we walked to the restaurant today [I was nowhere *near* organized enough to get invited to a seder] all the way across town, which is a whole 1.1 mile by Google Maps, so I am in a way car-virtuous) I do not have a private jet, and I can wear a t-shirt saying "One Fewer Private Jet," and I win.

Anonymous said...

Oh, that was me.

(krixpms -- Mrs. Kris Kringle's seasonal bad mood)

Marisa said...

That's exactly what I tell people about the MAPW...that it helps me argue my positions. So many of my coworkers spend a lot of time arguing grammar points with RNs who think they know better, and it's just not necessary.

Also, that "customization" page was available when we were at CMU, but only on paper. I had it, but I didn't find it that helpful.

Additionally also, I'm kind of famous a little on the MAPW job placement page. "Proposal Writer for a drug development services company?" That could only be me.

JC said...

Four plus three DOESN'T equal eight? I never got that memo either.

ijgoolh -- if you lick an Igloo and your tongue sticks, this is what your explanation will sound like for the next few days.

Anonymous said...

Marisa - did you see how the customization page said "Most Recommended Elective Course Options" Shouldn't that be "most highly recommended" or "most often recommended?" And isn't "elective course option" redundant?

Are we in that movie "The Game?"

Anonymous said...

I just want to say, I love this post. Not this post that I'm posting, but rather, the original post regarding which I am posting. Clear? Clear. I think it would be fair to say that your very posting of it, dear l&i, proves that there is in fact one less schmuck in the world. Even though you yourself were, of course, never one.

Happy Worker said...

I secretly call it the MAPW smack-down. and it works like 98% of the time.

(but how frustrating is that 2% of the time it doesn't work? grrrrrrrrrrrr. (and no... about it.))

Mark said...

I think 'one less' is a buddhist thing.

Lore & Ipsum said...

Dusty - I deleted your comment because the story you linked to had a byline, and I'm trying not to do that (for now). But yeah, I still have my Pgh phone number - and my Pgh phone from a million years ago. Grandmothers on busses make fun of my phone. Though I like my Pgh phone number, I think the real reason is that I don't want to switch unless I can get a coveted 617 area code, and I don't think I can. I'm not proud of this.

Dusty said...

I imagined only after the fact that a link to a thing with a name that is so like not yours here would be ... unsavory. Kudos to you for making my hard-won words invisible.

You'll be added to the new phone oh, when I get around to it this weekend sometime probably.